Effect of Formulated Concentrate Feeding Level on Milk Yield and Quality among Lactating Friesian Cows

  • Monica Yator Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology University of Eldoret
  • Jackson K. Kitilit Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology University of Eldoret,
  • Francesca Lusweti Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization2 P.O. BOX 3, Kitale
##article.subject##: Formulated ration, Milk quantity, Milk composition, Lactating cows

##article.abstract##

Dairy cattle hold enormous significance to humans as they convert energy stored in indigestible plant mass into milk and meat which are digestible and consumed by man.  The dairy sub-sector contributes substantially to the 25% of the GDP from Agricultural sector in Kenya. The most important feature of the sub-sector is its change from large to small scale production features, which constitutes two thirds of total dairy herd. Feeding is an important component of keeping milk production at optimum level. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of allocating different supplementary levels of formulated diet on milk production and composition among five lactating Holstein Friesians. The cows were fed on chopped Napier grass as a basal diet and supplemented with 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 kg/litre of milk produced/cow/day of the formulated diet as treatment 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The formulated diet contained the following ingredients, Male maize line grains, molasses, sunflower husk, soya bean meal, rejected beans, milling maize chaff, cotton seed cake, limestone, dicalcium Phosphate (DCP) and dairy Premix. A sub-sample of the formulated diet was collected and analyzed for, DM, CP, NDF, ADF and Ash. The cows under experiment received a mineral supplement of 100g/day, and clean water provided adlib. Milk yields were taken daily and analyzed for Composition. The milk yields were 4.40, 5.1, 5.70, 6.54, and 7.30L/day for treatment 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. There were highly significant (p<0.001) differences in milk yields on supplementation levels where 66% increase in milk yield was found at 1.25 kg of supplementation. There was no significant difference in milk composition for all treatment levels of the formulated diet. From this study, it was concluded that formulated ration can be used to improve milk production of dairy animals.

Author Biographies

Monica Yator, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology University of Eldoret

Department of Animal Science,

School of Agriculture and Biotechnology

University of Eldoret,

P.O. BOX 1125, Eldoret

Jackson K. Kitilit, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology University of Eldoret,

Department of Animal Science,

School of Agriculture and Biotechnology

University of Eldoret,

P.O. BOX 1125, Eldoret1

Francesca Lusweti, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization2 P.O. BOX 3, Kitale

Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization

P.O. BOX 3, Kitale

References

Angus, A., Burgess, P. J., Morris, J., & Lingard, J. (2009). Agriculture and land use: demand for and supply of agricultural commodities, characteristics of the farming and food industries, and implications for land use in the UK. Land Use Policy, 26, S230-S242.
AOAC International(2000).Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis.17th edition, Washington D.C.
Bargo, F., Muller, L. D., Kolver, E. S., & Delahoy, J. E. (2003). Invited review: Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of dairy science, 86(1), 1-42
Biwott, K.J., Kaitho, R., Gachuiri, C. K., Wahome, R. G. and Tanner, J (1998). Effects of levels of Concentrate supplementation on Milk production and Body weights of lactating dairy cows.
Dutta, M. (2011). Nutritional strategies to improve dairy cow production and reproduction. www.com/Nutritional strategies.
Faverdin, P., DulPhy, , J.P. ,Coulon, J.B. ,Verite, R. , Garel ,J.P., Rouel, J. &Marquis, B. ,(1991) Substitute of roughage by concentrates for dairy cows. Livest.Prod. Sci 27, 137-156.
Government of Kenya (GOK). 2015. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries,Towards an innovative,commercially oriented and modern agriculture.Strategic plan for 20132017.Revised,.Government printer, Nairobi.
Grainer, C. & Mathews, G. L., (1989),Positive relation between substitution rate and pasture allowance for cows receiving concentrates. Aust. J.exp.Agric 29,355-360.
Jaetzold, R. (1983). Natural conditions and farm management information. B (Central Kenya) and C (East Kenya). Farm management handbook of Kenya.
KNBS (2013). Kenya National Bureau of statistics Economic survey highlights.http://www.scribd/document/Kenya
Meeske, R. ,Rothauge, A., Van der Merwe, G. D. and Greyling, J. F.(2006).The effect of concentrate supplementation on the productivity of grazing Jersey cows on a pasture based system.
Robaina, A. C. , Grainger, C. , Moate, P. , Taylor, J. & Steward, J. (1998).Response to grain feeding by grazing dairy cows. Aust. J. Exp. Agric,38, 541-549.
##submissions.published##
2018-03-02
##section.section##
Articles