Factors Affecting Days Open among Smallholder Dairy Cattle in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

  • Biamah K. Philip Department of Animal Science and Management, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Eldoret. P. O. Box 1125, 30100 Eldoret, Kenya
  • Omega Joseph A Department of Animal Science and Management, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Eldoret. P. O. Box 1125, 30100 Eldoret, Kenya
  • Kios K, David Department of Animal Science and Management, School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Eldoret. P. O. Box 1125, 30100 Eldoret, Kenya
##article.subject##: Days open, calving intervals, first days in milk

##article.abstract##

The dairy industry in Uasin Gishu County (UGC) provides nutrition and employment among Smallholder dairy Farmers (SDF). The reproductive and productive potential of dairy cattle within the recommended range 85-110 days open (DO) ensures a calf per year. The study sought to determine factors influencing DO among SHF in UGC. 216 cows were purposively selected and artificially inseminated in the three agro-ecological zones (AEZ) of UGC. Further selection DO on 116 was determined. Focus group discussions (FGD) and interviews of key informants (KI)were held, in DO data. Data from the animals was subjected to t-tests to establish the differences within AEZ, breeds, farming systems, and conception status while Information from the FGDs was presented descriptively. Mean DO for AEZ 3 of 206 ± 20 days was significantly lower than those of AEZ 1, 303 ± 35 and AEZ 2, 281 ± 34. Mean DO for Ayrshire, Friesian and Zebu cross of 264 ± 30, 258 ± 28 and 244 ± 24 days respectively weren’t significantly different as of 227 ± 34 for intensive farming systems and 260 ± 20 days for semi-intensive farming. DO for cows confirmed in-calf was 237 ± 21 and those that weren’t, was 279 ± 27 days. The average DO (255 ± 17) was significantly longer than 85-110 days.  High cost of feeds, poor record-keeping, and inadequate Veterinary services (VS) resulted from the FGDs and interviews of KI. Inadequate VS forced farmers to handle dystocias and other obstetrics complications resulting in post-parturient metritis and consequently, prolonged DO. Other factors included poor management of cows in the first 100 days in milk, poor record-keeping, irregular supplementation, and inadequate extension services. Good nutrition after pregnancy and veterinary and extension services are necessary for a calf-per-year-per cow.

 

References

Bell, M. J., & Roberts, D. J. (2007). The impact of uterine infection on a dairy cow’s performance. Theriogenology, 68(7), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.010

Berry, D. P., Lee, J. M., Macdonald, K. A., Stafford, K., Matthews, L., & Roche, J. R. (2007). Associations Among Body Condition Score, Body Weight, Somatic Cell Count, and Clinical Mastitis in Seasonally Calving Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(2), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71546-1

Bewley, J. M., Peacock, A. M., Lewis, O., Boyce, R. E., Roberts, D. J., Coffey, M. P., Kenyon, S. J., & Schutz, M. M. (2008). Potential for Estimation of Body Condition Scores in Dairy Cattle from Digital Images. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(9), 3439–3453. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0836

Buják, D., Szelényi, Z., Choukeir, A., Kovács, L., Kézér, F. L., Boldizsár, S., Molnár, L., & Szenci, O. (2018). A Holstein-Friesian dairy farm survey of postparturient factors influencing the days to first AI and days open in Hungary. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 66(4), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2018.054

Esposito, G., Irons, P. C., Webb, E. C., & Chapwanya, A. (2014). Interactions between negative energy balance, metabolic diseases, uterine health, and immune response in transition dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 144(3–4), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.007

Földi, J., Kulcsár, M., Pécsi, A., Huyghe, B., de Sa, C., Lohuis, J. A. C. M., Cox, P., & Huszenicza, Gy. (2006). Bacterial complications of postpartum uterine involution in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 96(3–4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.006

Fourichon, C., Seegers, H., & Malher, X. (2000). Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: A meta-analysis. Theriogenology, 53(9), 1729–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00311-3

Gicheha, M. G., Akidiva, I. C., & Cheruiyot, R. Y. (2019). Genetic and economic efficiency of integrating reproductive technologies in cattle breeding program in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51(2), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1689-1

Jaetzold, R. (2010). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya: Volume II: Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information; Annex: Atlas of Agro-Ecological Zones, Soils and Fertilising by Group of Districts; Subpart A2: Nyanza Province Homa Bay and Migori County.

Inchaisri, C., Jorritsma, R., Vos, P. L., Van der Weijden, G. C., & Hogeveen, H. (2010). Economic consequences of reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology, 74(5), 835-846.

Kibiego, M. B., Lagat, J. K., & Bebe, B. O. (2015). Competitiveness of Smallholder Milk Production Systems in Uasin Gishu County of Kenya. 8.

Kios, D. K., Tsuma, V., & Mutembei, H. (2018). Factors affecting adoption of embryo transfer technology in dairy cattle in Kenya. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(8).

Krueger, R. A., and Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th edition). SAGE

Mabonga, G. N., & Ogallo, L. (2018). Herd Structure and Dairy Performance on Smallholder Dairy Farms in Uasin Gishu County. African Journal of Education, Science, and Technology, 4(3), 160–173.

Macharia, J. (2019). Sustainable Development in Kenya. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 13, 172–183. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/48573777

Maizon, D. O., Oltenacu, P. A., Gröhn, Y. T., Strawderman, R. L., & Emanuelson, U. (2004). Effects of diseases on reproductive performance in Swedish Red and White dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 66(1–4), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.002

Mugambi, D., Mwangi, M., Wambugu, S., & Gitunu, A. (2015). Assessment of performance of smallholder dairy farms in Kenya: An econometric approach. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 85(1), 7891. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v85i1.13

Muraya, J., VanLeeuwen, J. A., Gitau, G. K., Wichtel, J. J., Makau, D. N., Crane, M. B., McKenna, B., & Tsuma, V. T. (2018.). A cross-sectional study of productive and reproductive traits of dairy cattle in smallholder farms in Meru, Kenya. 14.

Omega, J. A., Kuria, J. K., & Musalia, L. M. (2019). Prevalence of Bovine and Ovine Paratuberculosis in Kericho County and Konoin Sub County, Kenya. Bull. Anim. Health Prod. Afr, 67, 181-189.

Radostits, O. M., Gay, C. C., Hinchcliff, K. W., and Constable, P. D. (Eds.). (2006). Veterinary Medicine E-Book: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. Elsevier Health Sciences

Rufino, M. C., Herrero, M., Van Wijk, M. T., Hemerik, L., De Ridder, N., & Giller, K. E. (2009). Lifetime productivity of dairy cows in smallholder farming systems of the Central Highlands of Kenya. Animal, 3(7), 1044–1056. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109004248

Torell, R., Bruce, D. B., Kvasnicka, D. B., Conley, K., & Research, G. (n.d.). Methods of Determining Age of Cattle. 3.

Walsh, S. W., Williams, E. J., and Evans, A. C. O. (2011). A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Animal reproduction science, 123(3-4), 127-138.
##submissions.published##
2021-10-24
##issue.issue##
##issue.vol## 6 ##issue.no## 4 (2021)
##section.section##
Articles