Factors That Determine the Nature of Relationship between Mothers and Their Daughters In-Law: A Content Analysis of the ‘Mother In-Law’ Tv Drama Series

  • Doreen Akech Orawo Department of Communication, University of Eldoret, Kenya
  • Patrick Lumumba Kutotto Department of Health Sciences, Eldoret National Polytechnic, Kenya
  • Joyce Kafu Department of Communication, Moi University, Kenya
##article.subject##: Nature of relationship, communication routines, supportive communication accommodation, cultural orientation

##article.abstract##

The relationship between mothers and their daughters-in-law remains of a strained nature despite the negative impacts it has on communication routines of families. While existing studies focus more on the dyadic relationships, there is a need to determine why this relationship has to be strained. This study therefore examined factors that determine the nature of the relationship between a mother and her daughter’s in-law as portrayed in family drama. Critical content analysis was used to analyze eight episodes of the ‘Mother-in-Law’ TV drama series aired on citizen TV. The episodes were sampled purposively basing on their composition of mother and daughter in-law scenes. Two coders conducted partial transcription of the episodes by playing back, recording and writing the content of the episodes. The summarized transcripts were then analyzed for content. Scott’s pi inter coder reliability value of 0.82 revealed that there was high agreement among the two coders on transcription. Content analysis revealed that independence, family identity, supportive communication, sense of belonging, accommodation, and cultural orientation are critical factors in the relationship between a mother and her daughters-in-law. Provision of an environment that can support these factors could therefore go a long way to improving the strained relations and hence communication routines of families.

References

Apter, T. (2012).What do you really want from me?: Learning to get along with in-laws. London, WW Norton & Co.

Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., & Meehan, J. M. (2001).The influence of in-laws on change in marital success.Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 614–626.

Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., & Sarason, I. G. (1994). Introduction. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, D. J. Goldsmith, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), The communication of support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. xi–xix). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Burton, G. (2000) Talking Television: An introduction to the study of television. New York, NY. Oxford University Press, Inc.

Freadman, A. (2001). The Classification of Signs (I): 1867 – 1885. http://www.digitalpeirce.org/186fre.htm Accessed on April 12, 2004

Hao, L. (1996).Family structure, private transfers, and the economic well-being of families with children.Social Forces, 75(1), 269-292.

Jackson, J., & Berg-Cross, L. (1988).Extending the extended family: The mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship of Black women.Family Relations, 293-297.

Jean Turner, M., Young, C. R., & Black, K. I. (2006). Daughters‐in‐Law and Mothers‐in‐Law Seeking Their Place Within the Family: A Qualitative Study of Differing Viewpoints. Family Relations, 55(5), 588-600.

Lerman, R. I. (2002). Marriage and the economic well-being of families with children: A review of the literature. The Urban Institute

Marotz-Baden, R., & Cowan, D. (1987). Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations, 385-390.

Merrill, D. H. (2007).Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: Understanding the relationship and what makes them friends or foe. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Mikucki-Enyart, S. L. (2011). Parent-in-law privacy management: An examination of the links among relational uncertainty, topic avoidance, in-group status, and in-law satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 235-263.

Miller, C. J. (2002). The Lawyer's Tale.Troubador Publishing Ltd.

Olutola, F. (2012).Wife-Mother-in-Law relationship and violence among Yoruba women of SouthWestern Nigeria.American Journal of Sociological Research, 2 (2):11-18.
Rawlins, W. R. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics and the life course. New York: Aldine deGruyter.

Rittenour, C., &Soliz, J. (2009). Communicative and relational dimensions of shared family identity and relational intentions in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relationships: Developing a conceptual model for mother-in-law/daughter-in-law research. Western Journal of Communication, 73(1), 67-90.

Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2002). Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 52, 402–415.

Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D.

Santos, J. D., & Levitt, M. J. (2007). Intergenerational Relations with In‐Laws in the Context of the Social Convoy: Theoretical and Practical Implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 827-843.

Soliz, J. & Harwood, J. (2006).Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship.Communication Monographs, 73, 87 107.

Sprecher, S. &Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.

Timmer, S. J., &Veroff, J. (2000). Family ties and the discontinuity of divorce in black and white newlywed couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 349-361.

Williams, T. (2014).Cat on a hot tin roof.Bloomsbury Publishing.
##submissions.published##
2018-04-03
##section.section##
Articles