Diatoms as Bioindicators in Monitoring Water Quality, River Sosiani, Kenya
##article.abstract##
The purpose of the study was to investigate the potential use of diatoms as biological monitors of environmental quality in Urban R. Sosianiin view of diatom distribution being affected by chemical, biological and physical characteristics of an aquatic system. In determination of Abundance, distribution and diversity of diatoms in relation to changing water quality variables, diatoms from benthic substrate in the riffle, littoral and the run with physical and chemical data were collected for a duration of six months from four strategically located sites covering a variety of anthropogenic activities along the river. Water quality parameters for instance total nitrogen whose changes are accounted for by the changing human activities but affecting diatom population were studied. During the study, a total of 9 diatoms genera unevenly distributed along the river were identified. In the upstream, the highest species diversity and relative abundance at 36.19% were recorded reducing to a relative abundance of 11.135% downstream. Pollution sensitive species; Gomphenema, Navicula and Tabellariasp were identified in the upstream while pollution tolerant species among them Melosira and Nitzchiadominating downstream that was characterized with high nutrient levels. It is reputable that human activities influenced water quality along the river continuum accredited to the changing human activities and water quality parameters resulting to less species diversity downstream necessitating pollution management measures unavoidable
References
Aura, C. M., Raburu, P. O., & Herrmann, J. (2010). A Preliminary Macroinvertebrate IBI for biossesment of the Kipkaren and Sosiani Rivers, Nzoia River Basin, Kenya. Lakes and Reservoirs, 15(2), 119128.
Bere, T., & Tundisi, J. G. (2009). The role of diatoms change. Environmental Science and Technology, 26, 23-33.
Bryan, J. R., Riley, J. P., Williams, (1976). A Winkler procedure for making precise measurements of oxygen concentration for productivity related studies. Exp Mar. Biol. Ecol, 21, 191-197.
De La-Rey, P. A., Taylor, J. C., Laas, A., Rensburg, L., & Van, V. A. (2004). Determining the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality: a comparison with SASS 5. Water SA, 30(3), 325-332.
Fleischner T.L. (1994) Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology, 8, 629–644.
Guy, B., Pat, S., & Janine A. (2004). A water quality index for use with diatoms in the assessment of rivers. University of Port Elizabeth, Port
Hillebrand, H., & Sommer., U. 2000b. Diversity of benthic microalgae in response to colonization time and eutrophication. Aquat.Bot. 67: 221-236.Jeffries, & Derek, (1990).https://www.google.co.ke/maps/@0.514827,35.2707074,15z
Karr, J. R. (1981). Assessment of biotic integration using fish communities. Fisheries, 6(6), 21–27.
Kelly, M. G. (1998). Use of community-based indices to monitor eutrophication in European rivers. Environ. Conserv., 25(1), 22-29.
Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Grenier, M., & Dillon, P. (2006). A diatom-based index for water quality assessment in eastern Canada: an application of Canonical Analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63, 1793–1811.
Lee, C. D., Kuo, C. L., & Wang, S. P. (1967). Benthic macroinvertabrates and fish as biological indicator, with reference to the community diversity index. Sci. Technol. Rep Taiwan Poll. Contr. Agency, 1, 1-44.
Lung’ayia, H.B. (2002). Assessment of water quality using Diatoms as bio-indicators in catchment of Lake Victoria, Kenya. PhD thesis, Virje Universitert Brussels. Faculty of Science laboratory of general botany and nature management, Belgium.
Njiru, M., Kazungu, J., Ngugi, C. C., Gichuki, J., & Muhoozi, L. (2008). An overview of the current status of Lake Victoria fishery:
Opportunities, challenges and management strategies. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manage., 13, 1-12.
Ntiba, M. J., Kudoja, W. M., & Mukasa, C. T. (2001). Management issues in the Lake Victoria watershed. Lakes Reserv. Res.
Manage., 6, 211-216.
Pan, Y., & Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Gradient analysis of diatom assemblages in Western Kentucky Wetlands. Journal of Phycology, 32, 222-232.
Patrick, R., & Reimer, C. W. (1966). The Diatoms of the United States, vol. 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
Raburu, P. O., Masese, F. O., & Christopher, A. M. (2009). Macroinvertebrate Index of Biotic Integrity (M-IBI) for monitoring rivers in the upper catchment of Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. Taylor & Francis London. pp 197-206.
Roger, J. F. (2005). A review of diversification trends in diatom research with special reference to taxonomy and environmental applications using examples from Lake Baikel and elsewhere. University College.
Sanet, J. V., Jonathan, T., Carin, V. G., & Annelise, G. (2006). Easy identification of most common freshwater algae. A guide for the identification of microscopic algae in South Africa fresh waters. ISBN 0-621-35471-6.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illinois Press Urbana III.
Whitmore, T. J. (1989). Florida diatom assemblages as indicators of trophic state and pH. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34(5), 882-895.
Winter, J. G., & Duthie, H. C. (2000). Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. Journal of North American Benthological Society, 19(1), 32-49.
Wu .J.T.(1996). Relation of change in River diatom assemblages to water pollution: Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Republic of China.
Wu, J.T. & Suen, W.C (1985). Change of algal associations in relation to water pollution. Bol. Bull. Academia Sinina 26:203-212.
