Effectiveness of Psychosocial Intervention to School Refusal Behavior among Pupils in Public Primary Schools in Keiyo North Sub-County, Elgeyo Marakwet County, Kenya

  • Agnes Oseko
  • Pamella Jemutai Toroitich Department of Educational Psychology, P.O Box 1125-30100, University of Eldoret.
  • Kisilu Kitainge
##article.subject##: psychosocial interventions, school refusal behavior, cognitive intervention strategy, primary school pupil

##article.abstract##

Despite the many efforts by parents, teachers, and counselors to curb school refusal behavior, there is much evidence that the problem has persisted from times immemorial. The objective of the study was to determine psychosocial intervention strategies to school refusal behaviour among pupils in public primary schools. The current study aimed to determine the Effectiveness of Psychosocial Intervention in reducing school refusal behavior among pupils in public primary schools in Keiyo North sub-county, Elgeyo Marakwet County, Kenya. The study was based on a positivist philosophy and Hirschi's control theory, which explains how attachment to a given school can be a means for a learner to make positive academic and social life choices. The research design employed was descriptive, and a survey was used. The targeted population was grade 7 and 8 pupils in public primary schools who were absent from school or class for at least 10% or more days in their previous academic year. They were identified with the assistance of their class teachers. Keiyo North Sub-County has a total of 5806 pupils in both classes. Purposive sampling was used to select the public primary schools participating in the research. Gill et al. (2010) used a sample size determination table to calculate the sample size, and a sample of 357 learners was derived. Four schools from each of the four zones in the sub-county were used for piloting and did not participate in the actual research. Data was collected using document analysis, which included attendance registers, records from guidance and counseling departments, discipline books, and pupils' questionnaires. To determine the validity of the research instrument, piloting, correlation analysis, and consultation with supervisors who are experts were done. Cronbach alpha was used to ascertain the reliability of the instruments, which resulted in an alpha value of 0.7. 

This was considered high enough and was thus accepted and used. Data from questionnaires were validated, coded, and tabulated, then analyzed with the help of the SPSS computer package for social science version 23. Descriptive statistics used were charts and percentages to present demographic data and inferential statistics (chi-square) to determine the relationship between dependent and independent variables. It was concluded that there is a relationship between psychosocial interventions and school refusal behavior and that the psychosocial support given to school refusers is not sufficient, thus making the problem of school refusal persist. The study recommended that urgent measures should be put in place to enhance the Effectiveness of intervention strategies to curb school refusal behavior. Also, all stakeholders should utilize intervention strategies that best suit their learners, collaborate to understand the underlying reasons for the problem of school refusal and create warm and friendly school and home environments for learners. Additionally, further studies should be carried out on other intervention strategies to curb school refusal behavior.

References

Antonio, J. Esteban-Guitart, M., & Bonal, X. (2024). The role of intrinsic motivation in the effects of a school-based intervention on academic

Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 589–595.

Berg, I. K. (2002). Solution-focused brief therapy: A handbook of evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.

Dietzell, C. (2022). Changing Negative Mindsets. Journal of School Counseling, 20(1).

Elliott, J. G., & Place, M. (1998). Children in difficulty: a guide to understanding and helping. UK: Routledge.

Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167-189.

Filippello,et al., (2020). School refusal in students with low academic performances and specific learning disorders. The role of self-esteem and perceived parental psychological control. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 67(6), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1626006

Fukuya, Y., Fujiwara, T., Isumi, A., Doi, S., & Ochi, M. (2021). Association between parenting and school refusal among elementary school children in Japan: results from A-CHILD longitudinal study. Frontiers in pediatrics, 9, 640780.

Hancock KJ, Shepherd CCJ, Lawrence D, Zubrick SR (2013). Student attendance and educational outcomes: every day counts. Report for the Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations

Havik, T., Bru, E., and Ertesvåg, S. K. (2015). Assessing reasons for school non-attendance. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 59 (3), 316–336. doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.904424

Heyne, D., and Sauter, F. (2013). "School refusal," in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Treatment of Childhood and Adolescent Anxiety. Editors C. Essau, and T. H. Ollendick (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 471–518.

Heyne, D. A., Sauter, F. M., & Maynard, B. R. (2015). "Moderators and mediators of treatments for youth with school refusal or truancy," in Moderators and mediators of youth treatment outcomes. Editors M. Maric, P. J. M. Prins, and T. H. Ollendick (UK: Oxford University Press), pp. 230–266. doi:10.1093/med: psych/9780199360345.003.0010

Lussier, J. P., Heil, S. H., Mongeon, J. A., Badger, G. J., & Higgins, S. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101(2), 192–203.

Kearney, C. A., & Silverman, W. K. (1995). Family environment of youngsters with school refusal behavior: A synopsis with implications for assessment and treatment. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 23(1), 59–72.

Kearney, C. A. (2002). Identifying the function of school refusal behavior: a revision of the school refusal assessment scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24(4), 235–245.

Kearney, C. A., & Chapman, G. (2008). School refusal behavior. Handbook of school mental health: Advancing practice and research, pp. 2, 129–147.

Porter, L. (2020). Student behavior: Theory and practice for teachers. Routledge.

Sonoda, S., Streimikiene, D., & Kriaučiūniene, J. (2008). School refusal behavior in Japanese and Lithuanian schools: A cross-cultural study. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(8), 931-939.ons, Canberra

Stiles-Shields, C. (2019). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for School Refusal. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 28(1), 47–59.

Benarous et al. (2022). Examining the hikikomori syndrome in a French sample of hospitalized adolescents with severe social withdrawal and school refusal behavior. Transcultural Psychiatry, 59(6), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615221111633
##submissions.published##
2024-10-25
##section.section##
Articles